Higher education institutions today rely on a complex web of digital tools, such as learning management systems (LMS), video platforms, assessment tools, content repositories, and more. In theory, this ecosystem promises all of the flexibility and innovation technology has to offer. In practice, it often creates friction, confusion, and frustration when what was supposed to be a beneficial tool turns out to be a disruption.
When new tools require extra logins, duplicate workflows, or time-consuming setup, adoption slows dramatically. The full potential of even the most effective active learning tool will not be realized if it feels like “one more thing” for instructors to manage.
That’s where interoperability, one of the pillars of sustainable active learning, comes in. The ability for systems to work together seamlessly isn’t just a technical capability, but a requirement to scale active learning in modern times.
If higher education institutions want active learning to take root with educators, in their courses, and across departments, it must work within the systems faculty already use, not around them.
Too much of a good thing: The EdTech fragmentation problem
A typical institution may use one platform for its LMS, another for video hosting, a third for assessments, and additional tools for engagement, collaboration, and analytics. While each tool may be effective on its own, they often operate in isolation.
This fragmentation leads to several challenges:
-
Multiple (too many) platforms: Faculty and students must navigate a growing list of tools, each with its own interface and learning curves. At a certain point, the number of platforms to learn reaches a critical mass and using each one to its full potential becomes too cumbersome and overwhelming.
-
Disconnected experiences: Learning activities may feel disjointed as students move between systems that don’t communicate with each other. This creates more questions when technology is designed to provide solutions.
-
Data silos: Insights about student performance are scattered across platforms. When data is analyzed in a vacuum, it is difficult to get a full, complete, and unbiased picture.
- Login fatigue: Repeated authentication requirements create unnecessary friction and reduce engagement. Not to mention they inadvertently encourage password reuse, which reduces security for the first step of authentication, essentially nullifying it.
When tools don’t work together, both teaching and learning suffer.
Faculty adoption depends on workflow
For faculty, the success of any tool comes down to one question: How does this fit into the way I work?
Many instructors organize their teaching around their LMS. It’s where they post materials, communicate with their students, manage assignments, and track grades. For some remote learning instructors, it’s also where they deliver their lectures. Tools that operate outside of the LMS environment demand a lot of context switching (and brainpower) from instructors. Not only can that get confusing — it requires educators to remember how to navigate and operate more user interfaces — but all of the duplicate tasks are inefficient and annoying.
It’s obviously a huge barrier to adoption when those who can implement technology effectively are the same people who feel annoyed about using it. Minimizing friction means meeting faculty where they are.
Tools that integrate directly into LMS workflows empower instructors because they can:
- Launch activities without leaving their course environment
- Reuse existing course structures
- Avoid duplicating content or grading processes
Of course, minimizing setup time is equally important. Faculty are far more likely to adopt tools they implement quickly, without extensive training or configuration.
In short, interoperability isn’t solely about systems. It’s about respecting faculty time.
The role of standards and integration
Behind the scenes, interoperability is possible by using a set of specific concepts and technologies. Guidance from 1EdTech Consortium provides a solid foundation for the standards that build scalable, connected learning environments. While the technical details can be complex, the core ideas are straightforward.
LMS integration
Integrating an LMS with other software tools (like Zoom, YouTube, or WeVideo) makes multiple tools accessible directly within a course environment. It also makes the experience more intuitive for students — instead of sending students to a separate platform, activities appear as part of the LMS experience. In turn, this enables seamless data flow and task automation.
Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI)
LTI, one of the most widely used standards for combining learning tools, allows secure connection within LMS platforms. Developed by 1EdTech Consortium, LTI makes it possible to enable features like single sign-on and seamless content embedding. The main source of value from LTI is the way it enables educators and learners alike to move between tools with minimal effort (or friction).
Data synchronization
At the highest level, data synchronization automates the process of updating records based on the most up-to-date information available. In education, these tools ensure that data points — such as grades or participation data — automatically “sync” and flow between systems. This eliminates the need for manual data entry and reduces errors.
API-based systems
API-based systems (Application Programming Interfaces) allow platforms to communicate more flexibly, supporting deeper integrations and more advanced use cases, such as real-time analytics or adaptive learning experiences.
Together, these concepts make it possible for tools to function properly together, as one cohesive system.
Interoperability enables institutional scale
We’ve already covered how integrated systems make it easier for faculty to adopt new tools without disrupting their teaching. For IT teams, interoperability also simplifies management by reducing the need for custom integrations and ongoing maintenance (or even more mundane tasks like password resets).
But interoperability is also a force multiplier because of the way it empowers students and gives the institution additional capabilities to assess outcomes.
Student experience
While the faculty experience is pivotal for the adoption of technology systems, a consistent student experience matters as well. Students that have trouble understanding how to use the technology that an institution has adopted are immediately faced with a massive road block that can significantly hinder their learning or create extra, unnecessary effort.
When interoperability is made a priority, students instead encounter familiar workflows and intuitive interfaces across courses, reducing confusion and cognitive load.
Unified analytics
By bringing together data from multiple sources, institutions can also gain deeper insights into student engagement, performance, and outcomes. This supports more informed decision-making beyond the course level, making it possible to make smarter decisions institution-wide.
What interoperable ecosystems look like in practice
In an interoperable ecosystem, the LMS serves as the central hub, the source of truth for all operations. When tools are as integrated as possible, faculty and students don’t even have to think about which tools are being used behind the scenes. They simply engage with learning activities in one cohesive environment.
Active learning tools are embedded directly into courses. A discussion activity, interactive video, or formative assessment appears alongside other course materials, without requiring additional logins or navigation. It’s almost magic, but better because it’s actually achievable.
Grading feels seamless. Scores from external tools automatically fill the LMS gradebook, saving time, while ensuring accuracy. Unified analytics give instructors the clear view of student progress they need to understand how the class is performing, without piecing together data from multiple systems.
Perhaps most importantly, manual setup is minimal. Faculty can adopt new tools quickly, in a few clicks, even, and start using them in their teaching right away.
In this kind of ecosystem, technology is no longer the focal point or topic of conversation. It fades into the background, which means interoperability has done its job, because now the learning can take center stage.
Interoperability is the answer to questions of scale
Active learning has the potential to transform higher education, but only if it can scale. And scaling doesn’t happen through standalone tools or isolated innovations.
When active learning tools work seamlessly within the systems already in use, they become easier to adopt, easier to manage, and easier to make work for students. Faculty can return their focus to teaching rather than technology. Students can focus on learning the material rather than learning how to find the information they need.
Scalable active learning happens through integration.