• Blog
  • »
  • Movie vs. Film: Are They Actually Different?

Movie vs. Film: Are They Actually Different?

/ WeVideo

The word film spelled out in Scrabble titles. WeVideo Film School logo in corner.

It's often said that the English language presents considerable challenges for learners. Even native speakers can find themselves puzzled by words with varying meanings, like movie vs. film, for example. Are they actually different?

The arts are also prone to seemingly interchangeable words. For instance, saying "I love this track," "I love this record," or "I love this song" might all express the same sentiment: I enjoy the music I hear. However, track, record, and song each carry distinct meanings when considered separately.

Filmmaking is similarly complex.

Film School illustration with laptop computer and the call to action, "Become a filmmaker, no matter your skill level."
So, what is the difference between film and movie? Is there one at all if the meanings are interchangeable?

For example, “Can you film this?” might mean the same as “Can you take a video?” Similarly, “Should we watch a movie?” might express the same meaning as, “Should we watch a film?” However, “Should we watch a video?” would not work in this context. But why?

Additionally, while you can create a movie using either film or video, using a movie to create a movie does not make sense. Confusing, right?  So let's slow things down to define the difference between film and movie (and even video) and better clarify these terms.

What is a movie?

Of the three terms, "movie" has perhaps the fewest additional connotations. Movie typically refers to a motion picture, but movies can also refer to the act of watching a feature motion picture in a cinema. For example, one might say, "Friday night at the movies!" to describe a cinematic outing.

It's important to note that the term is predominantly associated with American English within the United States. In contrast, cinema-goers often refer to movies outside the U.S., particularly in British English and across Europe, as films.

Although there's no official decree on this classification, it’s interesting that works leaning more toward an artistic platform — such as documentary films, independent films, surreal films, and short films — are typically not categorized as movies within their respective circles.

Stephen Follows, a well-regarded data researcher in the film industry whose work has been published in nearly every major online and print film outlet, conducted an extensive study on the usage of "film" versus "movie." His research included over 3,000 responses from industry professionals and analyzed 239,000 industry headlines, 10,282 major newspapers, and Reddit posts from 2004 to 2016. 

The findings reveal a clear division: casual cinema-goers in America predominantly use "movie," while industry professionals and Europeans are more likely to use "film." This data reflects regional language preferences and highlights how terminology can signify deeper cultural and professional attitudes toward cinema. 

Learn more about his research to see how these nuances impact how you experience these terms differently.

Film School illustration with laptop computer and the call to action, "Become a filmmaker, no matter your skill level."

What is a film?

The term "film" is commonly divided into three categories: the media, the format, and the action. It’s these categories that can help us understand how the term differs from and relates to similar terms like "movie" and "video."

The definition of film is most often associated with the motion picture art form — an art form that conveys a narrative, whether through a traditional storyline ("Parasite"), the factual exploration of a documentary ("The Queen of Basketball"), or the abstract expressions of experimental art ("Lost Highway"). This perception of film as a medium naturally leads us into the complex world of filmmaking. 

So, how’s a film made? They film it… using film.

Yeah, here we go again…

Why we still say "to film"

Last year, esteemed filmmaker Christopher Nolan presented his Oscar-winning film "Oppenheimer." Throughout the press run, we heard that the movie used no CGI and was entirely 'filmed' in-camera.

Video via Vanity Fair

The phrasing "to film" is important to recognize, as the verb form is imperative to how our three terms have become interchangeable. The term originates from the medium used to capture motion pictures.

Film (film stock), a thin layer of light-sensitive material typically made of celluloid, was the predominant medium for shooting films until the early 2010s. With the advent of the digital era, making a film with film became a sought-after luxury that directors had to fight for, rather than it being a conventional norm. However, much like how a painter uses paint to make a painting, this format has led to the term "film" being used to refer to motion pictures as a complete entity and the act of capturing a motion picture.

Why "film" feels more artistic

Again, it's important to note that "film" is often associated with motion pictures that are considered to have higher societal value and demand more from the audience. For instance, would you categorize the French Art House motion picture "Portrait of a Lady on Fire" as a film or a movie?  

Contrast that with "Avengers: Age of Ultron," which many would consider a movie (including famed director Martin Scorsese).

In terms of the movie vs. film debate, some suggest that a "movie" is a commercial product designed for mass consumption, primarily to generate profit and provide entertainment that meets audience expectations. On the other hand, a "film" is thought to address more serious themes with an artistic intent.

What is a video?

While the term "video" originally referred to the electronic process of recording digital or analog signals to produce visual images, it has evolved significantly beyond its initial concept. In modern language, "video" may encompass more meanings than both "film" and "movie" combined. 

For example, if you were born between the 1980s and just before the turn of the millennium, you might associate video more with home tape-based formats like Betamax or MiniDV, or more commonly, the VHS (video home system) tapes rather than video broadcasting.

Today, video has taken on several new meanings in the context of digital media. Quite like how a floppy disk is commonly used as a save icon, despite being as outdated as a VHS, video is the common term used when referring to any form of digital visual media with motion. 

The interchangeability of the term video, as well as the confusion, typically arises when it comes to the practice of making films. For example, let’s look at Darren Aronofsky’s 2010 film "Black Swan."

While most of the film was shot on traditional 16mm film, there was a moment of guerrilla filmmaking (shooting on location without permission and incognito) using a Canon 7D — a DSLR camera that can be purchased for a few hundred dollars on eBay. How did they film on the Canon 7D? Well, they used "video" mode. 

Video via Joaquinn Salinas

So, if we want to get pedantic, part of the film, which was mainly shot on 16mm film, was also made with video. However, we would not call “Black Swan” a video; it is a film. Yet, if we were to download a section of "Black Swan" to edit into our video essay (which you can easily do with WeVideo), that snippet of film would be considered as a video clip. 

Earlier, the French film "Portrait of a Lady on Fire" was referenced as an example of a work that would typically be called a film rather than a movie. Despite this, it was shot on a RED digital cinema camera, and browsing B&H for such a camera would place it under the "Pro video" section. Even though filmmakers might label their digital creations as "films," they are technically "videos" due to their digital format.

The term "video" evolved into a catch-all phrase for a wide range of media. As language evolves, the distinctions between various visual storytelling methods become blurred. For example, "to video" might suggest recording a detailed documentary or capturing high-quality footage using professional cinema equipment. In more casual settings, shooting a video might simply refer to taking a brief clip on a cellphone for social media sharing.

Film School illustration with laptop computer and the call to action, "Become a filmmaker, no matter your skill level."

Key differences: Movie vs. film vs. video

To summarize:

Movie

  • Commonly used in American English to describe a feature-length motion picture.
  • Seen as a commercial product primarily aimed at entertainment and profit.
  • Less frequently used in formal or artistic discussions.
  • Can also be used to describe the act of watching a film at the cinema when referenced as “Going to the movies.” 

Film

  • Often used to refer to the motion picture art form and associated with higher cultural value.
  • Considered more artistic, serious, and demanding of the audience.
  • Can mean:
    • The physical film stock 
    • The art form 
    • Or the act of filming

Video

  • Originally referred to recording and broadcasting images on a tape-based medium. 
  • Evolved to include a wide range of digital media, extending beyond traditional film or movie formats.
  • Used in professional contexts (e.g., digital cinema cameras) and everyday use (e.g., video on a cellphone).
  • Encompasses a broader scope in the digital age, from professional production to casual social media clips.

Explore the movie vs. film inquiry as a creator

Ultimately, no matter where you land in the movie vs. film debate, one thing remains true: none of these terms should prohibit you from creating your own project! Plus, the more you create, the more likely some of these principles become clear from experiencing the process firsthand.

Whether you're making a video, movie, or film, you can do so today, right now, with WeVideo. Just sign up for a free plan to get started. And with the support of this guide, once you promote your final product to the world, you'll likely know which term feels best to use to get the word out. Good luck!

FAQs

1. What is the difference between a movie and a film?

Movies are often commercial products created for entertainment and profit, whereas films are considered more as cultural and artistic expressions. Films demand more from audiences than movies.

2. When should you use "movie" versus "film?"

While each term has its own distinction, it’s also important to understand that the terms used can directly affect how your work or project is perceived. For example, in the film industry, what a creator calls their work can influence everything from the funding it receives to its distribution channels and its audience's expectations.

A project labeled as a "film" might be expected to offer more artistic value or intellectual engagement, attracting a different kind of audience than one marketed as a "video," which might be perceived as more online-focused. A project labeled a "movie" more generally speaks to the American way of describing motion pictures.

If you’re an esteemed Hollywood director, perhaps you’re making a film. Or maybe you’re making the summer’s next greatest blockbuster movie. If you’re a business or solopreneur, your next great digital marketing asset is probably a video. And that’s fine! Just like art itself, its terminology is often subjective.

3. Does it matter if you say movie or film?

Yes and no. It depends on the context. If you're attending a film festival, you'd likely feel out of place (and rightfully so) to call something a movie, as film festivals often appreciate more technical and artistic aspects of filmmaking. But if you're seeing a movie and call it a film, it's unlikely anyone would think twice about it. 

Essentially, it helps to know your audience and intention before selecting between movie vs. film, but in everyday language, these two terms generally remain interchangeable.